Home Comparison Arc Pro A60M vs GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3

Arc Pro A60M vs GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Arc Pro A60M and 256MB VRAM GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Arc Pro A60M 's Advantages
Released 15 years late
Boost Clock1300MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 11.23GB/s)
2040 additional rendering cores
GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 's Advantages
Lower TDP (13W vs 95W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A60M +26525%
5325
GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3
20

Graphics Card

Jun 2023
Release Date
Jun 2008
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce 9M(9000M)
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1300 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
11.23GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
1
2048
Shading Units
8
128
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
256
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

83.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.116 GPixel/s
166.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.116 GTexel/s
10.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.325 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS

Board Design

95W
TDP
13W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-256
GPU Name
G98
ACM-G12
GPU Variant
G98-700-U2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
6 nm
Process Size
55 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.21 billion
Unknown
Die Size
80 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net