Arc Pro A60M vs GeForce 800M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Arc Pro A60M and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 800M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc Pro A60M 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1300MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2000 additional rendering cores
GeForce 800M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 95W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A60M
+3650%
5325
GeForce 800M
142
Graphics Card
Jun 2023
Release Date
Mar 2014
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce 800M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1300 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
1
2048
Shading Units
48
128
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
8
256
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
83.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.476 GPixel/s
166.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.904 GTexel/s
10.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.325 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
141.7 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
11.81 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
15W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
Graphics Processor
DG2-256
GPU Name
GF117
ACM-G12
GPU Variant
N14M-GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.585 billion
Unknown
Die Size
116 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
