3D Rage IIC PCI vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 26 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2550MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
12800 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
Aug 2023
Rage 2
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1155 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2550 MHz
83 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
32GB
SDR
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
100
-
Shading Units
12800
1
TMUs
400
1
ROPs
176
-
Tensor Cores
400
-
RT Cores
100
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
72 MB
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
448.8 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
1020 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
65.28 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
65.28 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1020 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x VGA
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
AD102
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
AD102
Rage 2
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
-
Shader Model
6.7
