3D Rage IIC PCI vs GeForce GT 430 PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 430 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GT 430 PCI 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (9.600GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
96 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
Oct 2010
Rage 2
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
83 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
512MB
SDR
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
2
-
Shading Units
96
1
TMUs
16
1
ROPs
4
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.800 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.20 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
268.8 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
22.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
49W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x VGA
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
GF108
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
GF108-300-A1
Rage 2
Architecture
Fermi
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
-
Shader Model
5.1
