Home Comparison 3D Rage IIC PCI vs RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

3D Rage IIC PCI vs RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 25 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores

Score

Graphics Card

Apr 1997
Release Date
Mar 2023
Rage 2
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1725 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2250 MHz
83 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

2MB
Memory Size
12GB
SDR
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
40
-
Shading Units
5120
1
TMUs
160
1
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
160
-
RT Cores
40
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
48 MB

Theoretical Performance

60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
360.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.04 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
23.04 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
360.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Rage IIC
GPU Name
AD104
Rage IIC PCI (215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
-
Rage 2
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

5.0
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
-
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net