3D Rage IIC PCI vs GeForce GTX 260
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (896GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
Jun 2008
Rage 2
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
83 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
896MB
SDR
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
448bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
24
-
Shading Units
192
1
TMUs
64
1
ROPs
28
-
L2 Cache
224 KB
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.86 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
476.9 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
59.62 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
182W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
GT200
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
G200-100-A2
Rage 2
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
-
Shader Model
4.0
