Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K500 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

NVIDIA GRID K500 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

We compared a Professional market GPU: 4GB VRAM GRID K500 and a Desktop platform GPU: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K500 's Advantages
640 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
Boost Clock1590MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (80W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K500
2.289 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 +24%
2.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Jul 2020
GRID
Generation
GeForce 16
Professional
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
1536
Shading Units
896
128
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
TU116
-
GPU Variant
TU116-150-KA-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
80W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy