Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A350M vs NVIDIA GeForce 820M

Intel Arc A350M vs NVIDIA GeForce 820M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A350M and 2GB VRAM GeForce 820M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A350M 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock1150MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 28.83GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 45W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A350M +183%
1.766 TFLOPS
GeForce 820M
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Mar 2015
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce 800M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

300 MHz
Base Clock
-
1150 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
901 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.83GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
384
48
TMUs
32
24
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

27.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.480 GPixel/s
55.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.92 GTexel/s
3.533 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.766 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
441.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
25.92 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
GK107
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

25W
TDP
45W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy