Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W vs Intel Arc A350M

NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W vs Intel Arc A350M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX450 25W and 4GB VRAM Arc A350M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W 's Advantages
128 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A350M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 24% (1150MHz vs 930MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX450 25W
1.667 TFLOPS
Arc A350M +5%
1.766 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2020
Release Date
Mar 2022
GeForce MX
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

720 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
930 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
896
Shading Units
768
56
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
6
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

29.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.60 GPixel/s
52.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.20 GTexel/s
3.333 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.533 TFLOPS
1.667 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.766 TFLOPS
52.08 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
441.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
DG2-128
N18S-G5
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Board Design

25W
TDP
25W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy