Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile

NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1747MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2090
1.332 TFLOPS
Quadro P5200 Mobile +571%
8.945 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Feb 2018
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1557 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1747 MHz
924 MHz
Memory Clock
1804 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
230.9GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
20
-
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
2560
64
TMUs
160
48
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
111.8 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
279.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
139.8 GFLOPS
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.945 TFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
279.5 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GP104
-
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
16 nm
3 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
100W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy