NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 360M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
496 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2090
+5023%
1.332 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 360M
0.026 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
May 2007
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
924 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
2
512
Shading Units
16
64
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
25.60 GFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
17W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
G86
-
GPU Variant
NB8M-GLM
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
3 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
