Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000

NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla C2075 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 247W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2075 +114%
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000
0.48 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Dec 2010
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
783 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
41.60GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
448
Shading Units
192
56
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GF106
GF110-351-A1
GPU Variant
GF106-875-KA-A1
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Board Design

247W
TDP
62W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy