Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (51W vs 62W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000 +52%
0.733 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000
0.48 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Dec 2010
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
41.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
192
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GF106
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
GF106-875-KA-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Board Design

51W
TDP
62W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy