Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon R7 A265

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon R7 A265

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 A265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 46% (1207MHz vs 825MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Max Q +876%
6.18 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 A265
0.633 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Jan 2014
Ampere-MW
Generation
All-In-One
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

682 MHz
Base Clock
725 MHz
1207 MHz
Boost Clock
825 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
384
80
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
8
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
96.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.80 GTexel/s
6.180 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.180 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
633.6 GFLOPS
96.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
39.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

95W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
Opal
-
GPU Variant
Opal XT
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
© 2025 - TopCPU.net