Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 285 vs AMD FireStream 9250

AMD Radeon R9 285 vs AMD FireStream 9250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
992 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 190W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 285 +229%
3.29 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2014
Release Date
Jun 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
10
1792
Shading Units
800
112
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

29.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
102.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
3.290 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.290 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
205.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
RV770
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Board Design

190W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy