Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 285 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB

AMD Radeon R9 285 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 6 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Lower TDP (190W vs 250W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB 's Advantages
Boost Clock902MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 285
3.29 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 780 6 GB +26%
4.156 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2014
Release Date
Sep 2013
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
863 MHz
-
Boost Clock
902 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
-
1792
Shading Units
2304
112
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

29.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
43.30 GPixel/s
102.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
173.2 GTexel/s
3.290 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.290 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.156 TFLOPS
205.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
173.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
GK110B
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
GPU Variant
GK110-301-B1
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Board Design

190W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy