Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs AMD FirePro V5900

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs AMD FirePro V5900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 +170%
1.658 TFLOPS
FirePro V5900
0.614 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2019
Release Date
May 2011
Radeon Pro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
10
Compute Units
8
640
Shading Units
512
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

20.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
41.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
1.658 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.658 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
103.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Polaris 23
GPU Name
Cayman
Polaris 23 XT GL
GPU Variant
Cayman LE WS
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Board Design

65W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy