AMD Radeon 680M vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
We compared a Integrated graphics card GPU: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon 680M and a Desktop platform GPU: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon 680M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2200MHz
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 65W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon 680M
+103%
3.379 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 3200
1.658 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Radeon 680M
+57%
2339
Radeon Pro WX 3200
1481
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Radeon 680M
+128%
1087
Radeon Pro WX 3200
476
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Jul 2019
Navi II IGP
Generation
Radeon Pro
Integrated
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
4GB
System Shared
Memory Type
GDDR5
System Shared
Memory Bus
128bit
System Dependent
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
640
48
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
70.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.72 GPixel/s
105.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.44 GTexel/s
6.758 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1.658 TFLOPS
3.379 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.658 TFLOPS
211.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
65W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Rembrandt
GPU Name
Polaris 23
-
GPU Variant
Polaris 23 XT GL
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
6 nm
Process Size
14 nm
13.1 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
208 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.4
