ATI Radeon HD 5750 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 5750 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI Radeon HD 5750 's Advantages
80 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
Lower TDP (65W vs 86W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 5750
1.008 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 3200
+64%
1.658 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2009
Release Date
Jul 2019
Evergreen
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
9
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
720
Shading Units
640
36
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
11.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.72 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.44 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1.658 TFLOPS
1008 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.658 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
103.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
86W
TDP
65W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Juniper
GPU Name
Polaris 23
Juniper LE
(215-0754009)
GPU Variant
Polaris 23 XT GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.04 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
166 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.4
