NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile and 4GB VRAM RTX A1000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 42% (1831MHz vs 1291MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 Mobile
2.974 TFLOPS
RTX A1000 Mobile
+152%
7.5 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro P2000 Mobile
2096
RTX A1000 Mobile
+109%
4398
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro P2000 Mobile
1723
RTX A1000 Mobile
+25%
2161
Blender
Quadro P2000 Mobile
231
RTX A1000 Mobile
+382%
1115
OctaneBench
Quadro P2000 Mobile
54
RTX A1000 Mobile
+172%
147
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1291 MHz
Base Clock
630 MHz
1291 MHz
Boost Clock
1831 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
224GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
9
SM Count
16
1152
Shading Units
2048
72
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.9 GPixel/s
92.95 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
117.2 GTexel/s
46.48 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.669 TFLOPS
2.974 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.5 TFLOPS
92.95 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
72.96 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
60W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
GA107
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
16 nm
Process Size
8 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
