NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile and 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1291MHz
128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 Mobile
+38%
2.974 TFLOPS
Quadro M3000M
2.15 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro P2000 Mobile
+3%
2096
Quadro M3000M
2016
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro P2000 Mobile
+83%
1723
Quadro M3000M
941
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1291 MHz
Base Clock
-
1291 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
9
SM Count
-
1152
Shading Units
1024
72
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.60 GPixel/s
92.95 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.20 GTexel/s
46.48 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.974 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
92.95 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
GM204
-
GPU Variant
N16E-Q1-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
5.2
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
