NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000 SE and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 122% (2050MHz vs 924MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000 SE
1.892 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+787%
16.79 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2016
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
823 MHz
Base Clock
1950 MHz
924 MHz
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
4096
64
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
29.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
262.4 GPixel/s
59.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
524.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
33.59 TFLOPS
1.892 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.79 TFLOPS
59.14 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
