NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 360M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
2288 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
+13565%
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 360M
0.026 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
May 2007
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
-
771 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
2304
Shading Units
16
192
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
25.60 GFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
17W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
G86
-
GPU Variant
NB8M-GLM
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
