NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 470
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 0System Shared VRAM Quadro FX 470 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
2288 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 470 's Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
+7795%
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 470
0.045 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Sep 2007
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
-
771 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
System Shared
GDDR5
Memory Type
System Shared
256bit
Memory Bus
System Shared
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
1
2304
Shading Units
16
192
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.320 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.640 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.80 GFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
38W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
C79
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
-
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
