NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Tesla T10
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 24GB VRAM Tesla T10 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 260W)
NVIDIA Tesla T10 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 102% (1560MHz vs 771MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (624.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
Tesla T10
+304%
14.38 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
1305 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
624.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
72
2304
Shading Units
4608
192
TMUs
288
48
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
149.8 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
449.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.75 TFLOPS
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.38 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
449.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
260W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
TU102
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
