NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 51% (1163MHz vs 771MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
+98%
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000
1.786 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro K5200
+34%
2072
Quadro M2000
1544
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro K5200
+36%
941
Quadro M2000
690
Blender
Quadro K5200
+102%
293
Quadro M2000
145
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Apr 2016
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
796 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1163 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
768
192
TMUs
48
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.22 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.82 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.786 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
55.82 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
GM206
-
GPU Variant
GM206-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
