NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 12GB VRAM Quadro K6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Lower TDP (150W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Quadro K6000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 17% (902MHz vs 771MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro K6000
+46%
5.196 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro K5200
2072
Quadro K6000
+35%
2809
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro K5200
941
Quadro K6000
+37%
1292
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
797 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
902 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
2880
192
TMUs
240
48
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
-
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.12 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.5 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.196 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.732 TFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
225W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
GK110B
-
GPU Variant
GK110-890-B1
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.5
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
