NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA GRID M3 3020
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 4GB VRAM GRID M3 3020 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 83.20GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID M3 3020 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 69% (1306MHz vs 771MHz)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
+112%
3.553 TFLOPS
GRID M3 3020
1.672 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
May 2016
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
1033 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1306 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
83.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
640
192
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.90 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
52.24 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.672 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.24 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
Unknown
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
GM107
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.7 (5.1)
