NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 2GB VRAM Quadro M520 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 40.10GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Lower TDP (25W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
+344%
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro M520 Mobile
0.8 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Jan 2017
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
-
771 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
40.10GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
384
192
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.328 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.66 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
799.5 GFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
24.98 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
25W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
GM108
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
Unknown
561 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
