NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 166% (2050MHz vs 771MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+372%
16.79 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
1950 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
4096
192
TMUs
256
48
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
262.4 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
524.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
33.59 TFLOPS
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.79 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
