NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 8GB VRAM Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Boost Clock771MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 68.29GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Lower TDP (15W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
+177%
3.553 TFLOPS
Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB
1.28 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Mar 2023
Quadro
Generation
Tegra
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
-
771 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1067 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
LPDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
68.29GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
8
2304
Shading Units
1024
192
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
32
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.560 TFLOPS
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1280 GFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
640.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
15W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
GA10B
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
Unknown
561 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
