Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Tesla K80

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Tesla K80

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 12GB VRAM Tesla K80 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)
NVIDIA Tesla K80 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 7% (824MHz vs 771MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.6GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
Tesla K80 +15%
4.113 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K5200
293
Tesla K80 +27%
373

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Nov 2014
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

667 MHz
Base Clock
562 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
824 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
240.6GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
2496
192
TMUs
208
48
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
-
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.85 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
171.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.113 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1371 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
GK210
-
GPU Variant
GK210-885-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
7.1 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.5
CUDA
3.7
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net