NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
256 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M5000 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 35% (1038MHz vs 771MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (211.6GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro M5000
+19%
4.252 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro K5200
2072
Quadro M5000
+77%
3675
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro K5200
941
Quadro M5000
+79%
1692
Blender
Quadro K5200
293
Quadro M5000
+13%
332
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Jun 2015
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
861 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1038 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
211.6GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
2048
192
TMUs
128
48
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
66.43 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
132.9 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.252 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
132.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
GM204
-
GPU Variant
GM204-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
