Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (59W vs 350W)
Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 10 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
6080 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1800
0.176 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 1T +6184%
11.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro FX
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

768MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
192bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
38.40GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

8
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
64
Shading Units
6144
32
TMUs
192
12
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
48 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.12 TFLOPS
176.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.06 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.765 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G94
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
G94 GL-U
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
65 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
8 billion
240 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

59W
TDP
350W
250 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy