Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4100M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800

NVIDIA Quadro K4100M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4100M and 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4100M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
1088 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (59W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4100M +824%
1.627 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1800
0.176 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Mar 2009
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
768MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
8
-
Compute Units
-
1152
Shading Units
64
96
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
12
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
48 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
67.78 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.627 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
176.0 GFLOPS
67.78 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
G94
N15E-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
G94 GL-U
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Board Design

100W
TDP
59W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy