Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 2700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 65W)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.14GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
16 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700M
0.099 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 2700M +28%
0.127 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2008
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-II
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s

Render Config

4
SM Count
6
-
Compute Units
-
32
Shading Units
48
16
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.480 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.72 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
99.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
127.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

G96
GPU Name
G94
NB9P-GLM
GPU Variant
NB9E-GLM2
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
65W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy