Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
4064 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700M
0.099 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 170 +16859%
16.79 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2008
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1950 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

4
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
32
Shading Units
4096
16
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
32
-
L1 Cache
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
262.4 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
524.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
33.59 TFLOPS
99.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.79 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

G96
GPU Name
DG2-512
NB9P-GLM
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.7
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy