NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M and 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
864 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700M
0.099 TFLOPS
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
+2886%
2.957 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2008
Release Date
Jun 2020
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1395 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
14
32
Shading Units
896
16
TMUs
56
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.914 TFLOPS
99.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.957 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
92.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G96
GPU Name
TU117B
NB9P-GLM
GPU Variant
N19P-Q1-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
