NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M and 48GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 300W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
7136 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700M
0.099 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max 1100
+22344%
22.22 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2008
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
7168
16
TMUs
448
8
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
204 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
694.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.22 TFLOPS
99.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.22 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
22.22 TFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin
Graphics Processor
G96
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
NB9P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.5
UMC
Foundry
Intel
65 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
100 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
