NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M and 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
992 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700M
0.099 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 140
+3934%
3.994 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2008
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1600 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1950 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
1024
16
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
99.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G96
GPU Name
DG2-128
NB9P-GLM
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.7
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
