NVIDIA Quadro 2000M vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 2000M and 4GB VRAM RTX A1000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 60W)
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 11 years late
Boost Clock1627MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000M
0.422 TFLOPS
RTX A1000 Embedded
+1479%
6.664 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2011
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1192 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1627 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
16
192
Shading Units
2048
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
78.10 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
104.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.664 TFLOPS
422.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.664 TFLOPS
35.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
104.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
55W
TDP
60W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF106
GPU Name
GA107S
N12P-Q3
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
Unknown
238 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
