Sony Playstation Portable GPU 65nm vs AMD Atari VCS 400 GPU
We compared two Game console GPUs: 2MB VRAM Playstation Portable GPU 65nm and 4GB VRAM Atari VCS 400 GPU to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Sony Playstation Portable GPU 65nm 's Advantages
Lower TDP (4W vs 15W)
AMD Atari VCS 400 GPU 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1201MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (38.40GB/s vs 5.312GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Dec 2020
Console GPU
Generation
Console GPU
Game console
Type
Game console
-
-
-
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
300 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1201 MHz
83 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
4GB
eDRAM
Memory Type
DDR4
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
5.312GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
192
5
TMUs
12
5
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
665.0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.804 GPixel/s
665.0 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.41 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
922.4 GFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
461.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
28.82 GFLOPS
Board Design
4W
TDP
15W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RE+SE-65nm
GPU Name
Banded Kestrel
CXD5029-304GG
GPU Variant
-
-
Architecture
GCN 5.0
Sony
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
65 nm
Process Size
14 nm
Unknown
Transistors
4.94 billion
Unknown
Die Size
210 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
-
Shader Model
6.4
