Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs NVIDIA A16 PCIe
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 16GB VRAM A16 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 231.9GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
NVIDIA A16 PCIe 's Advantages
Boost Clock1695MHz
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
+145%
10.65 TFLOPS
A16 PCIe
4.339 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Apr 2021
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Base Clock
885 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1812 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
231.9GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
10
4096
Shading Units
1280
256
TMUs
40
256
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
40
-
RT Cores
10
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.24 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.80 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.339 TFLOPS
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.339 TFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
135.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
GA107
-
-
-
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
12 nm
Process Size
8 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.5
Shader Model
6.6
