Home GPU Comparison Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs NVIDIA P104 101

Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs NVIDIA P104 101

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 4GB VRAM P104 101 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 256.3GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA P104 101 's Advantages
Boost Clock1683MHz
Lower TDP (125W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000 +23%
10.65 TFLOPS
P104 101
8.617 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2018
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1300 MHz
Base Clock
1506 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1683 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2002 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.3GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
20
4096
Shading Units
2560
256
TMUs
160
256
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
107.7 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
269.3 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
134.6 GFLOPS
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.617 TFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
269.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
125W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
GP104
-
GPU Variant
GP104-101-A1
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
16 nm
Unknown
Transistors
7.2 billion
Unknown
Die Size
314 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.5
Shader Model
6.4
© 2025 - TopCPU.net