Home
GPU Comparison
ATI Mobility Radeon X1600 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
ATI Mobility Radeon X1600 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Mobility Radeon X1600 Mac Edition and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 12.67GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
Mar 2023
M5x
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2010 MHz
396 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.67GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
-
Shading Units
3072
4
TMUs
96
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.592 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.48 GPixel/s
1.592 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
193.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.35 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
12.35 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
193.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
50W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
M56
GPU Name
AD107
-
-
-
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
150 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
3.0
Shader Model
6.7
