Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350

Intel Arctic Sound M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 96GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (96GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (2458GB/s vs 1229GB/s)
6144 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (450W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M
14.75 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max 1350 +201%
44.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Jan 2023
Xe Graphics
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
750 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
96GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM2e
4096bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
2458GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
8192
Shading Units
14336
256
TMUs
896
128
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
896
-
RT Cores
112
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
408 MB

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1389 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
44.44 TFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.44 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
44.44 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
6 nm
Process Size
10 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
100 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
450W
900 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy