Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
7808 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M
+1912%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000
0.733 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Mar 2013
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
8192
Shading Units
384
256
TMUs
32
128
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
8 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
51W
900 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
