Intel H3C XG310 vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 62% (2505MHz vs 1550MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
17408 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
+3724%
91.06 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2020
Release Date
Dec 2022
H3C Graphics
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
915 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
2505 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
48GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
960.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
142
768
Shading Units
18176
48
TMUs
568
24
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
568
-
RT Cores
142
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
96 MB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
481.0 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1423 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
91.06 TFLOPS
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.06 TFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1423 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
300W
700 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
AD102
-
GPU Variant
AD102
Generation 12.1
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
5 nm
Unknown
Transistors
76.3 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.4
Shader Model
6.8
