Intel H3C XG310 vs Moore Threads MTT S2000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Boost Clock1550MHz
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S2000
+347%
10.65 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2020
Release Date
Unknown
H3C Graphics
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
1300 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
32GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
4096
48
TMUs
256
24
ROPs
256
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.8 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.8 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
21.30 TFLOPS
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.65 TFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
166.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
150W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
-
-
-
Generation 12.1
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
12 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
95 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5
