Intel H3C XG310 vs ATI FirePro V3750
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 256MB VRAM FirePro V3750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3750 's Advantages
Lower TDP (48W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
+576%
2.381 TFLOPS
FirePro V3750
0.352 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2020
Release Date
Sep 2008
H3C Graphics
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
256MB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
320
48
TMUs
32
24
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
352.0 GFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
300W
TDP
48W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.0
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
RV730
-
GPU Variant
RV730 PRO
(215-0719056)
Generation 12.1
Architecture
TeraScale
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
55 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.514 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1
