Home GPU Comparison Intel H3C XG310 vs ATI FirePro V3750

Intel H3C XG310 vs ATI FirePro V3750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 256MB VRAM FirePro V3750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3750 's Advantages
Lower TDP (48W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
H3C XG310 +576%
2.381 TFLOPS
FirePro V3750
0.352 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2020
Release Date
Sep 2008
H3C Graphics
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
256MB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
4
768
Shading Units
320
48
TMUs
32
24
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
352.0 GFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

DG1
GPU Name
RV730
-
GPU Variant
RV730 PRO (215-0719056)
Generation 12.1
Architecture
TeraScale
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
55 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.514 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
48W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy